Advertisement

Omnivore

Thing which thinks

From e-flux, a special issue on “The End of the End of History?”, including Oxana Timofeeva on the end of the world: From Apocalypse to the end of history and back; James T. Hong on the nationalist thing which thinks: Notes on a genealogy of ultranationalism; Lawrence Liang on ultranationalism: A proposal for a quiet withdrawal; and is the world sleeping, sleepless, or awake or dreaming? Zalmay Khalilzad and Kenneth M. Pollack on how to save Iraq: This is the best, or the least bad, solution to


Paper Trail

Jeb Lund picks on Ed Klein’s new book about the Clintons, Blood Feud—specifically, Klein’s calling attention to Hillary’s swearing: “Utilizing someone’s occasional profanity as the basis of a character attack is up there with a sinister ad voiceover saying, Candidate John Cussbrother uses toilets.” Former judge Stuart Kelly makes predictions for the Man Booker prize

Syllabi

Weird Sex

Vanessa RovetoThere's good sex and there's bad sex. And then there's weird sex—a Freudian purgatory that somehow neither stimulates the libido nor inhibits it. In art and life, we're inclined to seek out pleasure

Daily Review

Blood on the Tracts

It would be easy to overlook the fact that communist literature is fictional, and, like most good fiction, bears, at least intermittently, some resemblance to the particulars of our real world. There is the desperation of the toiling many, alongside the indifference of the privileged few, and rounded out by the inability, ever, by anyone, to find a lasting solution.

Interviews

William T. Vollmann

William T. Vollmann's latest story collection considers death from a variety of perspectives, veering from realistic to supernatural, from reportage-like writing to the ghost story. Bookforum talks with the author about his new book, his FBI files, his ongoing research of coal mines and the environment, and his female persona, Delores.

Excerpt

F for Fake

Brian Dillon

What exactly do we mean when we call an artist or writer a charlatan? What manner of truth is in question? Assuredly, an artistic or literary charlatan is not merely a fraud, a forger, or an impostor. Such quasi-criminal categories have their own clear-cut logic: The perpetrator either is or isn't what he purports to be. But an accusation of charlatanry points to something far more fundamental than a simple waywardness with the facts.

Advertisement