John O. McGinnis (Northwestern) and Russell G. Pearce (Fordham): The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services (and more). Elizabeth G. Porter (Washington): Taking Images Seriously. Jordan M. Singer (New England): Gossiping About Judges. Carla D. Pratt (Penn State): Judging Identity. Meera E. Deo (UCLA): Looking Forward to Diversity in Legal Academia. Alfred L. Brophy (UNC): Ranking Law Schools with LSATs, Employment Outcomes, and Law Review Citations. Kelsey A Webber (Georgetown): Which Law Schools Make Rational Economic Sense to Attend. Jorge R. Roig (Charleston): The First Thing We Do (“This article analyzes the arguments for and against tenure in legal academia”). Brian Leiter on how philosophy has been central to legal education for more than a century. Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz on intellectual diversity in the legal academy: Because elite American law faculties are so far to the left of the American judiciary, these faculties can be startlingly poor at analyzing the actual practice of American law. Are judicial nominations broken, and how should we fix them? Leon Neyfakh on the custom justice of “problem-solving courts”: A new kind of court is reshaping the American legal system — with little oversight. From The Jury Expert, why do we ask jurors to promise that they will do the impossible? Susan Macpherson wonders. The duty to disregard the law: Michael Huemer on why jurors are often morally obligated to disregard the law. Justice as a luxury: Deborah Beth Medows on the inefficacy of middle class pro se litigation and exploring unbundling as a partial solution.
